Adam Kalsey

This is the blog of Adam Kalsey. Unusual depth and complexity. Rich, full body with a hint of nutty earthiness.

Management & Leadership

Tyranny of Outcomes

19 Aug 2023

"Outcomes over outputs."

So often we talk about measuring work by the impact it creates, not whether we did it. A goal of "ship Foo in Q3" isn’t nearly as good as "35 new users are using Foo" or "retention increased 12% after releasing Foo."

This extreme focus on outcomes can have an undesired effect on product teams. The team might stop doing anything that doesn’t directly drive a business metric. They can start choosing only metrics that they know how to move - which tend to be the easy, well-understood problems. For teams with quarterly goals, it can lead to focusing on short-term metrics that can move in a few weeks.

It is tempting to use output goals as a solution for these problems. "Establish a baseline for retention" or "learn why users aren’t adopting new features."

But a better way is to re-frame these outputs as an outcome. An outcome is simply a behavior change in a person. "Increase retention by 12%" is a behavior change in your customer - more of them stick around.

This is a great way to handle goals when you don’t really know yet what the business outcome looks like. It can help teams address long-term, ill-defined problems.

If you want to "learn why users aren’t adopting new features," think about why you don’t already know this. Why is it hard for you to get this answer? Is it because you don’t have product analytics? Then your outcome could be "answer two new questions about product usage each week." If it’s because you’re not talking weekly with customers, then perhaps your goal could be "product teams have spoken to 20 customers." Those are outcomes. They are measuring a behavior change in your team. Before, the world looked one way, but after you made changes, it looks a different way.

If your goal is "ship the new feature in time for the September marketing event" then ask yourself why shipping itself is the goal. Perhaps you’ve had trouble hitting deadlines before and you want to fix that with iterations and continuous delivery. The behavior you want to change is all about how you ship, so frame your goal that way. This might turn into "Demonstrate continuous delivery by shipping 6 releases this quarter that each improve the new feature needed for the September marketing event."

Recently Written

Your OKR Cascade is Breaking Your Strategy
Aug 1: Most companies cascade OKRs down their org chart thinking it creates alignment. Instead, it fragments strategy and marginalizes supporting teams. Here's what works better than the waterfall approach.
Your Prioritization Problem Is a Strategy Problem
Jul 23: Most teams struggle with prioritization because they're trying to optimize for everything at once. The real problem isn't having too many options—it's not having a clear strategy to choose between them. Without strategy, every decision feels equally important. With strategy, most decisions become obvious.
Behind schedule
Jul 21: Your team is 6 weeks late and still missing features. The solution isn't working harder—it's accepting that your deadlines were fake all along. Ship what you have. Cut ruthlessly. Stop letting "one more day" turn into one more month.
VC’s Future Lies In Building Winners
Jun 21: AI and megafunds are about to kill the traditional venture model, forcing smaller VCs to stop hunting for hidden gems and start rolling up their sleeves to fix broken companies instead.
Should individual people have OKRs?
May 14: A good OKR describes and measures an outcome, but it can be challenging to create an outcome-focused OKR for an individual.
10 OKR traps and how to avoid them
May 8: I’ve helped lots of teams implement OKRs or fix a broken OKR process. Here are the 10 most common problems I see, and what to do instead.
AI is Smart, But Wisdom Requires Judgement
May 3: AI can process data at lightning speed, but wisdom comes from human judgment—picking the best imperfect option when facts alone don’t point the way.
Decoding Product Leadership Titles
Mar 18: Not all product leadership titles mean what they sound like. ‘Head of Product’ can mean anything from a senior PM to a true VP. Here’s how to tell the difference.

Older...

What I'm Reading